DECISION-MAKING BEHAVIOR OF LOAN RESTRUCTURING BASED ON INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS: CASE STUDY BANK PERKREDITAN RAKYAT INDUSTRY IN WEST JAVA REGION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47312/aar.v4i01.219Abstract
This research examines the phenomena of loan restructuring decision behavior carried out by BPRs’ actors (loan officers or loan managers) in West Java Province. It is aimed to answer the research questions: why rural banks (BPRs) as institutional fields pay less attention to loan restructuring to recover the accounting losses from the provision of problem loans. According to Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (2017), 94 out of 290 BPRs in West Java Province did not feel eager to restructure the problem loans despite having a ratio of Non-Performing Loans (NPL) more than 5% threshold. The behavior itself could be motivated by both symbolic factors and material factors as carriers for their behavior. Two prior studies conducted by Micucci and Rossi (2010), Dardac, Barbu, and Boitan (2011) examined loan restructuring based on policies and its impact on banks as institutional but did not reveal the behavioral side of the restructuring decision-making proceed by an individual of loan managers and loan officers. Thus, this study is aimed at observing the individual motivation of actors symbolized by loan managers and loan officers in rural banks (BPRs) in West Java Province. The analysis of decision taken by loan officers or loan managers in this study uses an institutional logic basis which theory focuses on the logic of actors both individually or collectively in such a particular economic sector. The results explain that symbolic carriers (regulations and accounting standards) and material carriers (informal practices, routines, individual target, accounting practice difficulties) revealed the phenomena related the behaviour of actors’ (loan managers and loan officers) in BPR which put less attention on loan restructuring - as one of the credit risk mitigation for troubled debt. Second, there is similarity for actors to avoid the troubled debt restructuring due to some difficulties in recognizing loss occurred in the beginning period of restructuring.
Keywords: And Accounting Practice, Behavior, Institutional Logics, Loss On Restructuring, Material Carriers, Motivation, Symbolic Carriers.Downloads
References
Bank Indonesia. (2006). Peraturan Bank Indonesia Tentang Kualitas Aktiva Produktif Dan Pembentukan Penyisihan Penghapusan Aktiva Produktif Bank Perkreditan Rakyat. Nomor: 8/26/PBI/2006.
Bank Indonesia. 2006. Peraturan Bank Indonesia No. 13/26/PBI/2006 tentang Perubahan Atas PBI Nomor 8/19/PBI/2006 tentang Kualitas Aktiva Produktif Dan Pembentukan Penyisihan Penghapusan Aktiva Produktif Bank Perkreditan Rakyat.
Bank Indonesia. 2006. Peraturan Bank Indonesia No. 8/19/PBI/2006 tentang Kualitas Aktiva Produktif Dan Pembentukan Penyisihan Penghapusan Aktiva Produktif Bank Perkreditan Rakyat.
Bank Indonesia. 2009. Surat Edaran Bank Indonesia Nomor 14/26/DKBU tentang Pedoman Standar Kebijakan Perkreditan BPR.
Bank Indonesia. (2010). Pedoman Akuntansi Bank Perkreditan Rakyat.
Birmingham, P., & Wilkinson, D. (2003). Using research instruments: A guide for researchers. Routledge.
Boeker, W. (1989). Strategic change: The effects of founding and history. Academy of Management journal, 32(3), 489-515.
Dardac, N., Barbu, T. C., & Boitan, I. A. (2011). Impact of credit restructuring on the quality of bank asset portfolio. A cluster analysis approach. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Œconomica, 7(3).
Davis, G. F. (1991). Agents without principles?: The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 583–613.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147–160.
DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. Institutional patterns and organizations culture and environment, 3-21.
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions.
Galaskiewicz, J., & Wasserman, S. (1989). Mimetic processes within an interorganizational field: An empirical test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 454–477.
Gilbert, C. G. (2005). Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of management journal, 48(5), 741-763.
Gilson, S. C., John, K., & Lang, L. H. (1990). Troubled debt restructurings: An empirical study of private reorganization of firms in default. Journal of financial economics, 27(2), 315-353.
Glynn, M. A., & Abzug, R. (2002). Institutionalizing identity: Symbolic isomorphism and organizational names. Academy of Management journal, 45(1), 267-280.
Ikatan Akuntansi Indonesia. 2009. Standar Akuntansi Keuangan Entitas Tanpa Akuntabilitas Publik. Jakarta: Dewan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan.
Jepperson, R. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, 143-163.
Johansen, C. B., & Waldorff, S. B. (2017). What are Institutional Logics-and Where is the Perspective Taking Us?. In New Themes in Institutional Analysis (pp. 51-76). Edward Elgar Publishing, Incorporated.
Laryea, T., & Laeven, M. L. (2009). Principles of household debt restructuring (No. 2009-2015). International Monetary Fund.
Laryea, T. (2010). Approaches to corporate debt restructuring in the wake of financial crises. International Monetary Fund.
Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of management inquiry, 20(1), 52-58.
Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and Institutional Work. SR Clegg, C. Hardy, TB Lawrence & WR Nord (eds.) Handbook of Organization Studies. 215-254. Sage. March, JG (1991) Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
Lawrence, T. B., Leca, B., & Zilber, T. B. (2013). Institutional work: Current research, new directions and overlooked issues. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1023-1033.
Lepoutre, J. M., & Valente, M. (2012). Fools breaking out: The role of symbolic and material immunity in explaining institutional nonconformity. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 285-313.
Micucci, G., & Rossi, P. (2010). Debt restructuring and the role of lending technologies.
Micucci, G., & Rossi, P. (2017). Debt restructuring and the role of banks’ organizational structure and lending technologies. Journal of Financial Services Research, 51(3), 339-361.
Mizruchi, M. S., & Stearns, L. B. (1988). A longitudinal study of the formation of interlocking directorates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 194–210.
Parker, L. “Social and Environmental Accountability Research: A View from the Commentary Box.” Accounting, Auditing &Accountability Journal18, No. 6 (2005): 842-60.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Statistik Perbankan Indonesia. 2017. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/perbankan/data-dan-statistik/statistik perbankanindonesia/ Documents/Pages/Statistik-Perbankan-IndonesiaDesember 2017/SPI%20Desember%20 2017.pdf
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Laporan Triwulanan. Triwulan IV-2017. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/data-dan-statistik/laporan-triwulanan/Documents/ Laporan%20Triwulan%20OJK%20IV-2017.pdf
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang No. 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perbankan. Sekretariat Negara, Jakarta.
Schramm, W. (1971). Notes on Case Studies of Instructional Media Projects.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. 2nd edn. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Sage.
Scott, W. R. 2008a. Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society, 37(5): 427–442.
Shauki, E.R.,”Qualitative and Mixed-Method Research Analysis Using Nvivo11”, Handout, CASE WRITING AND METHODOLOGY, ECAM 809303. University of Indonesia, April 2018, Print.
Suddaby, R. (2013). Institutional theory. The Sage Encylopaedia of Management Theory, 379-38.
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801-843.
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 840, 99-128.
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Tuttle, B., & Dillard, J. (2007). Beyond competition: Institutional isomorphism in US accounting research. Accounting Horizons, 21(4), 387-409.
Zietsma, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2010). Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative science quarterly, 55(2), 189-221.
Zilber, T. B. (2009). Institutional maintenance as narrative acts. Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations, 205-235.
Zilber, T. B. (2013). Institutional logics and institutional work: Should they be agreed?. In Institutional logics in action, Part A (pp. 77-96). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Zuckerman, E. W. (1999). The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American journal of sociology, 104(5), 1398-1438.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
