MOTIVE AND OBSTACLES IN MAKING A DECISION AS EARLY ADOPTERS OF PSAK NO. 71 FOR IMPAIRMENT PROVISION OF LOANS (STUDY CASE IN INDONESIA BANKING INDUSTRY)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47312/aar.v3i02.191Abstract
IFRS 9 has converged into PSAK No. 71 and became effective on January 1, 2020 where early implementation is permitted. Changing in accounting standards might have caused controversy. However, there are bank in Indonesia had implemented before PSAK No. 71 effectived (early adopters). This study aims to determine the motive of early adopters of PSAK No.71, the obstacles they faced and the impact especially through loan impairment. By using study case method in Indonesia banking industry and then collect data using semi structured interviews and content analysis. DiMaggio and Powell (1983) explained that institutional theory emphasizes institutional patterns formed because the influence of policy from inside and outside the company (symbolic carriers). Therefore, the motive behind the institutions and actors (material carriers) decision to become early adopters will be revealed. In this case, we found that early adopters are mostly the bank with ownership as foreign bank and mixed bank (as subsidiary). Also, the primary motive of the bank when decide to early adopt are based on following their holding that mandatory to implement IFRS 9. This could create a good external reporting because the accounting standard between holding company and its branch or subsidiary will be similar.
Keywords: Banking, Financial Instrument, Early Adopters, Institutional Theory, PSAK No. 71Downloads
References
Akdon., & Hadi, S. (2004). Aplikasi Statistik dan Metoda Penelitian Untuk Administrasi dan manajemen. Bandung: Dewi Ruchi.
Apriyani. (2018). Penerapan PSAK 71, Berdampak pada Penurunan Modal Bank, [online], (http://infobanknews.com/penerapan-psak-71-berdampak-pada-penurunan-modal-bank/, diakses tanggal 15 Mei 2018).
Ball, R. (2006). International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): pros and cons for investors. Accounting and Business Research, International Accounting Policy Forum, 5-27.
Bank Indonesia. (2009). Surat Edaran No. 11/33/ DPNP tanggal 8 Desember 2009 tentang perubahan atas surat edaran No. 11/4/DPNP tanggal 27 Januari 2009 tentang Pelaksanaan Pedoman Akuntansi Perbankan Indonesia.
Bouvier, S. (2017). Accounting standards body rejects complaint over due diligence, [online], (https://www.ipe.com/pensions/pensions/pensions-accounting/accounting-standards-body-rejects-complaint-over-due-diligence/10021721.article, diakses tanggal 13 Oktober 2018)
Dewan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan Indonesia. (2016). Exposure Draft Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan 71 Instrumen Keuangan, Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.
Dewan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia, Materi Public Hearing ED PSAK 71 Instrumen Keuangan, Oktober 2016.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
Ellet, W. (2007). The Case Study Handbook. Publisher: Harvard Business Press. ISBN 978-1-4221-0158-2.
Doyle, A. (2018). What is a Semi Structured Interview?, [online], (https://www.thebalancecareers.com/what-is-a-semi-structured-interview-2061632, diakses tanggal 1 November 2018)
Gatot, S. (2009). Perbankan dan Masalah Kredit: Suatu Tinjauan di Bidang Yuridis. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Hasibuan, H. Malayu SP, 2011. Dasar-dasar perbankan. Jakarta: PT.Bumi Aksara
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia (IAI). (2016). Standar Akuntansi Keuangan revisi. 2016. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.
Ismail. (2010). Manajemen Perbankan dari Teori Menuju Aplkasi. Penerbit Kencana. Jakarta.
Kasmir. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Perbankan, Edisi Revisi. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Johnson, R.B. & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14-26.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Martani, D. (2018). Belajar ED PSAK 71 Instrumen Keuangan. https://staff.blog.ui.ac.id/martani/2016/11/18/belajar-ed-psak-71-instrumen-keuangan, (diakses pada tanggal 10 Maret 2018).
Muhammad. T. (1999). Perkreditan Bisnis Inti Perbankan. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Prihadi, T. (2011). Laporan Keuangan Sesuai IFRS & PSAK. PPM Manajemen. Jakarta.
PWC Indonesia. (2017). Indonesia Banking Survey 2017. Jakarta
Rahardjo, M. (2017). Studi Kasus dalam penelitian Kualitatif: Konsep dan Prosedurnya. Malang: Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.
Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 tentang Perbankan sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1998 Nomor 182, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3790.
Santoso, W. (2018). Fostering Growth. Annual Financial Executive Gathering. Tanggal 18 Januari 2018. Jakarta, Indonesia.
Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Scott, W.R. (2004). Encyclopedia of Social Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Shauki, E.R.,”Qualitative and Mixed-Method Research Analysis Using Nvivo 11”, Handout, Case Writing and Methodology, ECAM 809303, (Elvia R. Shauki, PhD) University of Indonesia, April 2018. Print.
Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative Case Studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 443-466). Thousand Oaks, CA,: Sage Publications Ltd.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Afabeta.
Witjakcono A. (2017). Dampak ED PSAK 71 Intrumen Keuangan Terhadap Pedoman Akuntansi Perbankan Terkait Kredit. Jurnal Online Insan Akuntan. 2 (1): 35 – 48.
Yasril., & Kasjono, H. S. (2009). Analisis Multivariat Untuk Penelitian Kesehatan. Penerbit Mitra Cendikia. Yogyakarta.
Zuckler, G.L. (1987) Institutional Theories of Organization. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol.13, pp. 443-464
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
