IMPACT OF CASH TRANSFER ON POVERTY

Deden Ferry Kurniawan, Hera Susanti

Abstract


This research aims to generate empirical evidence on the impact of cash transfers on Poverty on households in Indonesia, using the Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS) panel data in 2007 and 2014, and the method of Difference-in-differences with propensity score matching. This study estimates the impact of relief and benefits that do not receive assistance on Poverty. Results are expected to find that the provision of assistance (cash transfers) has a significant impact on poverty in terms of beneficiaries and who does not receive assistance, or viewed from a total of two (beneficiaries and who are not receiving assistance). It is found that the provision of assistance to the people who were targeted as shown to improve the welfare of beneficiaries, but have not been able to exceed the group that did not receive aid.

JEL Classification: I31, I32, I38

Keywords: Cash transfer, Difference-in-differences, Poverty, Propensity Score Matching


Full Text:

PDF

References


Analysis Team. (2014). A New Era in Poverty Alleviation in Indonesia, Poverty Analysis Program in Indonesia (INDOPOV). Jakarta: World Bank.

Bazzi, S., Sumarto, S., & Suryahadi, A. (2010). Of safety nets and safety ropes: An evaluation of Indonesia's unconditional cash transfer program (2005 2006). Smeru Research Institute

Bazzi, S., Sumarto, S., & Suryahadi, A. (2013). It's All in the Timing: Household Expenditure and Labor Supply Responses to Unconditional Cash Transfers. Munich Personal RePEc Archive.

Cuong, et al. (2009). The Impact of Work Welfare and Non-Work Migration on Household Welfare, Poverty and Inequality: New Evidence from Vietnam. Economics Bulletin, 15(1), 1-11.

DeJong, Barrientos, A., & Jocelyn. (2006). Reducing Child Poverty with Cash Transfers: A Sure Thing. Development Policy Review, 537-552.

Directorate of Poverty Alleviation Bappenas. (2014). Collection of Training Materials for Monitoring and Evaluating Poverty Alleviation Programs. Bappenas and Project Pro Poor Planning and Budgeting.

Foster, J., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures. Econometrica, 52 , 761-765.

Kerm, P. V. (2009). "Computing poverty measures with survey data". 7 th German Stata Users Group meeting-IZA Bonn, CEPS / INSTEADLUXEMBURG & ISER, University of Essex

Khandker, S., Koolwa l, G., & Samad., H. (2010). Handbook on Impact Evaluation: Quantitative Methods and Practices. Washington DC: The World Bank.

Gertler, P. J., Martinez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. B., and Christel, M. (2001). Impact Evaluation in parctice. Washington DC: The World Bank.

Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1998). Matching As an Econometric Evaluation Estimator. The Review of Economic Studies, 65(2), 261-294.

Leuven, E., & Sianesi, B. (2014). PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common su pport graphing, and covariate imbalance testing, Statistical Software Components. Boston College Department of Economics.

Lundine, J., Hadikusumah, RY., & Sudrajat, T. (2013). Indonesia's progress on the 2015 Millennium Development Goals. Indonesia 360 , 56-66.

Noroyono, O. (2013). Impact Analysis of the Implementation of the 2008/2009 Direct Cash Transfer Program on Consumption, Education, Health and Household Work Patterns . Disertation, Depok: University Indonesia.

PAPBN, D. (2014). Ministry of Finance . Retrieved August 29, 2015, from the Ministry of Finance: http://www.anggaran.depkeu.go.id/dja/edef- content-view.asp? Id = 977

Reyna, O. T. (2015). Difference in Difference (using stata). Princeton University. Http: //dss.princeton.edu/training/

Rosen., & Gayer. (2010). Public Finance: Ninth Edition. Singapore: Mc Graw Hill, International Edition.

Variant, H. R. ( 1992). Microeconomic Analysis 3rd ed. New York: WWNorton & Company.

Soares, F. V, et al. (2006). Cash Transfer in Brazil: Impact on in equality and poverty. UNDP.

Skoufias., & Cossio, G. (2008). The impact of Cash Transfer and In-Kind Transfer on Consumptions and Labor Supply: Experiment Evidence from rural Mexico. Policy research Working Paper 477. Impact Evaluation Series, No. 27.

Skoufias, E., & Maro, V. D. (2006). Conditional Cash Transfers, Adult Work Incentives, and Poverty. Impact Evaluation Series, 5.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.47312/aefr.v3i02.203

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.